Tag-Archive for ◊ books ◊

Roads of Writing
Wednesday, February 01st, 2012 | Author:

From my position as a ghostwriter and writing/editing/ghostwriting instructor, I come into contact with a tremendous number of writers. Ergo, it has come to my attention that the writing world has more pathways than most of us have fingers and toes: academics, scholars, memoirists, novelists, speech writers, playwrights, screenwriters, TV writers, business writers, comedy writers, biographers, political pundits, bloggers, online content creators, copy writers, marketing gurus, self-help authors, and on and on and on.

In the past few days, I’ve encountered two completely diverse situations that speak to the lack of commonality of this enormous, diverse community and how we perceive ourselves within that loose fellowship.

The first came up during my talk with a wonderful novelist. She sold  her first book to an online/POD publisher and subsequently joined its author community via blogging and blog commenting. Problem is, she feels isolated within this group, which she specifically joined to enjoy that wonderful sense of connection we all seek with our fellow writers and authors. Their writing goals and process seem so  different from hers.  The only common ground she can find is their mutual affection for the publisher and desire to get their stories down in writing.

I noticed the second situation in a LinkedIn group discussion as I read over the various answers to a question about the writing industry and thought about my own perspective on the topic. I admit it: I’m ever the optimist. I look at a problem and, like a Ferengi, I suppose, see opportunities and possibilities, not gloom and doom. Yes, the writing and book worlds have changed, enormously. But they haven’t ceased to exist–they’ve merely become different, and I don’t think the answer to “better pay for better writing” is in legislation, but in our individual selves.

So what is the point of this blog? I guess just to point out that writers come in all flavors. That our vast conglomerate of folk never has been and never will be a one-size-fits-all. Writing is so darn individualistic, it cannot and should never try to be stuffed into round holes. We are the last, great independents in a world hellbent on conformity.

Few will remember Gary Cooper or Alice Cooper in 100 years, but they’ll still know Dickens, Austin, and Rowling. And maybe, just maybe, you and me.

And, with nods to Dr. Who, Agatha Christie.

Share
For Novelists II
Thursday, June 18th, 2009 | Author:

I’ve recently run into the same situation with two novelists: their protagonists were neither sympathetic nor likable. I didn’t want either one to come out on top. In fact, I wished both characters would simply drop dead somewhere around the end of chapter two–which was essentially what happened, because I stopped reading.

I am a ghostwriter; it’s my job to keep reading. Imagine if I was a literary agent or acquisition editor — I would never have pushed through as far as I did. And in both cases, the fault lay in accuracy; both novelists assured me “this is what really happens.”

Bully. “What really happens” is the stuff of news reports and nonfiction. Not novels.

Novels are fiction; i.e., “made up” or “pretend” or “not real.” People who read novels are looking for a protagonist they can either pretend to be, enjoy reading about, or at least root for. Granted, despicable characters can be a lot of fun to write. Where would fiction be without rapists, murders, and thieves? They challenge the protagonist, create undeserved misfortunes, and provide dramatic tension. But regardless of how much depth and backstory you provide for them, they cannot be the main character.

We have to like the main character.

Got a really juicy bad guy? Great! Set him up to drive an equally enticing good guy nuts. Let that delicious queen of unrelenting evil needle and aggravate the flawed but lovable protagonist princess to distraction. Maybe you’ve got a kamikazi pilot bent on killing as many Americans and Brits as possible–no problem. But either he’s a guy torn between duty and morality or he’s got to go up against an Allied hero. And even if the  hero doesn’t survive, the kamikazi has to somehow lose.

Bottom line: fiction needs to be satisfying; real history seldom is.

So unless you can figure out a way to make them sympathetic or redeeming, don”t offer a rapist, murderer, drug dealer, pimp, hijacker, or (ugh) politician as your protagonist. Flip the story around and make them the villain.

Your readers will thank you.

Questions? Call 1-800-641-3936

Share